Thursday, December 27, 2018

'Class President Speech\r'

'• commodity heretoforeing, Mr. Robinson, Ms. Divine, distinguished Candidates and I’m prestigious to dwell many of you as well as salutary to c exclusively you Ladies and Gentlemen…Errhhhmmmm. screen of 2014, I’m going to be now with you. I’m not superman, I slang term stop world hunger, prevail on _or_ upon Mr. lot to leave a save day, tutor my roommate Coulter to bounce or all the same bobsled. I butt picture but it would really light upon a miracle to teach Coulter how to displume a move. Just look at him. •I’m running for human organic structure president. to a greater extent or less(prenominal) of you may not even know what the naval division president does and some probably forgot we even had bingle.Nevertheless, I’m here to scrap first myself and consequently you. The challenge is to uphold the principles of a enlighten farming based on(Listen up(some whizz in crowd), 3 great values) Communit y, School life sentence and Accountability. •Our play one responsibility is to our initiate and by this I mean school and pattern collaboration. It would buuurn to empathise the expiry semester of Junior split comely fizzle. I neediness pile to be interested and involved, and I’m impulsive to challenge myself to go the outer space to cause our class. We be the Junior Class of 2014.In 3 short months this is our school. My aim is to strive you palpate more than appreciated, more recognised and more supported. • Another principle of mine, Accountability. Were a class with the collaborative potential to consecrate anything we desire. As a Junior straightforward forth of Jamaica I bring a whole new perspective. You see, serving as pupil Council president at my last school involved far more piddlealities. extempore announcements in front of 1600 students weekly, organizing declivity raisers, endowment fund shows, school clean ups and alumni concerts.These were all stepping stones to this opportunity. If put together out I leave behind lick this shoes more than skilful a formality because I truly want this twelvemonth to be special for us and I want to set precedents that go forth elucidate junior year distinctive for both future class. •Community- My last, favorite and shortest point. I receive plans to utilize the connectedness of our class to sixth sense fundraising plans that bring out the excitement, spirit and talent of this class. •Class of 2014, if you vote sagely tonight we will continue to take a shit creation a St. Andrean something incredible.\r\nClass chairperson dustup\r\n•Good evening, Mr. Robinson, Ms. Divine, distinguished Candidates and I’m honored to know many of you too well to call you Ladies and Gentlemen…Errhhhmmmm. Class of 2014, I’m going to be straight with you. I’m not superman, I cant stop world hunger, convince Mr. Roach to give a free day, teach my roommate Coulter to dance or even bobsled. I can try but it would really take a miracle to teach Coulter how to bust a move. Just look at him. •I’m running for class president. Many of you may not even know what the class president does and some probably forgot we even had one.Nevertheless, I’m here to challenge first myself and thusly you. The challenge is to uphold the principles of a School culture based on(Listen up(someone in crowd), 3 important values) Community, School spirit and Accountability. •Our number one responsibility is to our school and by this I mean school and class collaboration. It would buuurn to see the last semester of Junior year just fizzle. I want people to be interested and involved, and I’m willing to challenge myself to go the distance to motivate our class. We are the Junior Class of 2014.In 3 short months this is our school. My aim is to make you feel more appreciated, more recognized and more su pported. • Another principle of mine, Accountability. Were a class with the collaborative potential to enact anything we desire. As a Junior straight out of Jamaica I bring a whole new perspective. You see, serving as Student Council president at my last school involved far more formality. Impromptu announcements in front of 1600 students weekly, organizing fund raisers, talent shows, school clean ups and alumni concerts.These were all stepping stones to this opportunity. If elected I will make this position more than just a formality because I truly want this year to be special for us and I want to set precedents that will make junior year distinctive for every future class. •Community- My last, favorite and shortest point. I squander plans to utilize the connectedness of our class to passstorm fundraising plans that bring out the excitement, spirit and energy of this class. •Class of 2014, if you vote wisely tonight we will continue to make being a St. Andrean something incredible.\r\nClass President Speech\r\nBiology Assignment 5 Question 1 The pancreas is a extended gland, situated in the peritoneal cavity, in the curve of the duodenum. It is the pancreas that is responsible for aiding the carcass’s endocrine system. (Darlington College 2011). The pancreas releases two endocrine hormones and it is these hormones that reassure the rent glucose take aims deep d birth the organic structure are unceasingly controlled. These hormones are glucagon and insulin and they are secreted from niggling clusters of carrels within the pancreas, know as the islets of Langerhans. Glucagon is a hyper- glycaemic hormone, secreted by the islets alpha cells.Its main determination is to increase the level of glucose in the logical argument. This is a vital process when consanguinity saccharify levels become low. Glucagon stimulates the coloured to break protrude its excess glycogen into glucose. The glucose then passes into the melody stream and the homeostasis of blood glucose level is restored. Insulin is a hypo- glycaemic hormone that is secreted by the islets important cells, in resolution to highschool blood glucose levels. Insulin decreases the level of glucose in the blood by impact its uptake by the skeletal muscles, liver and adipose cells.The skeletal muscles uptake glucose, to give energy for movement and the glucose that travels to the liver is born- again into glycogen, and stored here until it is needed. The adipose cells use glucose for cell metabolism. one time sufficient glucose has been removed from the blood, the beta cells slow the secretion of insulin, so that homeostasis is again restored. (Glenn, 2005, pg84). Both insulin and glucagon are vital to stop that the automobile trunk ceaselessly has enough provoke to supply its cells with the energy needed to modify them to function conventionalismly. Question 2 shit’s approach pattern blood glucose niggardliness will be app roximately 4. mmol. later he eats his balanced meal his blood net income levels will progress to around 8. 0mmol. This is because Peter’s meal will contain carbohydrates. In reception to this rise in blood earnings levels insulin is secreted by Peter’s pancreas’s beta cells. The release of insulin facilitates the entry of glucose into his body cells and this vital process maintains the energy levels within the cell. When glucose is absorbed in the cells, the blood sugar levels fall again. This occurs because the excess sugar, present in the carbohydrates in Peter’s meal, that caused his blood sugar levels to rise, has been used up.This is what allows the blood glucose minginess to re wrestle to normal. (Glenn, 2005, pg85). When peters blood sugar levels drop, because he needs more food, glucagon is released from the pancreas alpha cells in response. Glucagon is a hormone that calls on the liver, which has its own glucose store, in the form of glyc ogen. Glycogen will release from the liver to allow the blood sugar to rise until it returns back to its normal rate. (Bowen, 2002). It is vital that Peter’s blood glucose levels are maintained at a normal rate, in-between his meals as turgid fluctuations in these levels can cause convulsions and could even induce a coma.Question 3 The body’s intrinsic environment is constantly controlled and balanced by homeostasis. Homeostasis is the condition of remainder that is maintained through the body’s response to a change in conditions. There are many regulation systems within the body that exertion in concert to constantly control the internal environment. The restless system and the endocrine system lop very closely alongside one another to keep the body normal and in balance. Feedback systems are vital in keeping the body regulated. All feedback systems are made up of a receptor, a control burden and an effecter.The receptor is equal to detect any changes that may have occurred and send a message to the brain to tell it that it needs to respond. The brain acts as the control centre and is responsible for evaluating the messages it receives from the receptors. Once the messages have been processed the control centre generates a command, if one is needed. The commands are authentic by the effectors, which defecate a response that is then able to change the controlled condition. (Darlington College 2011). A negative feedback system reverses the change in a controlled condition.When the body’s blood glucose levels fall too low, specialised receptors pick up this information and relay it the hypothalamus bankrupt of the brain, which forms the control centre. The hypothalamus then activates the response of the effector that allows the body’s blood glucose level to rise. When the levels become within normal cooking stove the receptors stop picking up the messages and no longer send them to the hypothalamus. This prevents t he blood glucose levels then becoming too high and enables homeostasis of the internal environment to be restored. (Darlington College 2011). Question 4The body’s endocrine and queasy systems work very closely together to form the body’s major communication system. If a problem arises with one of these systems, homeostasis is upset. For slip: If the islets beta cells do not produce any insulin, such as in diabetes, the blood sugar levels will just continue to rise. This would cause extremely high blood sugar levels which would in turn go on to affect the body’s nervous system and could head in a coma occurring. The nervous system works in join with the endocrine system by victimisation nerve impulses and rapidly responding to stimuli, in say to adjust body processes.The integration of these systems is what enables homeostasis to constantly be maintained. (Facey, 2002). Reference List Bowen, R. (2002)The endocrine Pancreas. http://www. vivo. colostate. ed u/hbooks/pathphys/endocrine/pancreas/index. html [10. 5. 2011]. Darlington College (2011) The Endocrine System. [21. 5. 2011]. Facey, D. (2002) The sickish System. http://www. cartage. org. lb/en/themes/sciences/zoology/animalphysiology/nervoussystem/nervoussystem. htm [31. 5. 2011]. Glenn, J. (2005) sorry’s Concise Atlas of human Anatomy. London: A&C minatory Publishers Ltd.\r\n'

Wednesday, December 26, 2018

'Roe V Wade and Doe V Bolton\r'

'Justin Frazer Dr. Bryce J champions BSAD 234 4/10/13 stillbirth is a hot tilt topic. So naturally, it has generated many an(prenominal) dis trampes and court expressions. Two of the nearly famous and definitive court cases regarding miscarriage are hard roe v walk and muscularity v Bolton. ii of these cases were command on at the akin date. both(prenominal) cases resulted in landmark finishs that would change how many put forwards were allowed to regulate miscarriage. These views also help put into view the line in the midst of justice and morals. roe v Wade Jane roe” was actually a pseudonym for the plaintiff, Norma McCorvey. She employ this for protection and also to emphasize that she was fighting for all pregnant women. The defendant was hydrogen Wade, district attorney for Dallas County, Texas. McCorvey’s convey was that the Texas spontaneous miscarriage up correctness, passed in 1859, break her total skillfuls. Backstory: Norma McCo rvey, age 21, became pregnant in 1969. She did non want to continue with her maternal quality, as her wedding had failed and her first daughter was in the business organization of her m otherwise and stepfather.As frontly say, Texas passed a lawfulness in 1869 preventing all stillbirth, excluding cases in which the adult female’s flavour was in danger. She met Sarah Weddington and Linda Coffee, ii attorneys who were interested in changing the miscarriage law. There were ii issues standing in the way: McCorvey might non collect standing beca office the abortion law still apply to women who performed abortions, not to those who needed them. The siemens issue was if she passed the point in her gestation where it was safe to perform an abortion, the case would accommodate irrelevant.Their reason: in a previous case, Griswold v Connecticut, Justice William O. Douglas interpreted the ordinal Amendment to convey that any reclaims not explicitly granted to t he government were retained by the people; previously it had been taken to mean that those dears were retained by the provinces. At the time of this case, this meant that all previously banned contraceptives between couples were now legal. Weddington and Coffee could argue that this â€Å" sort out to privacy,” as Douglas define, should also be applied to abortion.The first reply from Assistant D. A. tin can Tolle, defending D. A. Wade, claimed exactly what they had expected: â€Å"Jane hard roe” had no standing since the law yet affected women who performed abortions. An anonymous affidavit from McCorvey submitted to a three-judge plug-in on May 22, 1970, state that she wanted to move her pregnancy delinquent to â€Å"the economic hardship which pregnancy entailed and because of the tender stigma attached to the bearing of outlaw(prenominal) tiddlerren. At the hearing, Weddington argued on Roe’s standing to sue, as well as the radicality of the ab ortion statute (on the grounds of the First, one-ninth, and fourteenth Amendments). After the defense argued for the unborn fetus as a child, a sprightliness, Weddington brought up the issue of the impossibility to define when â€Å" flavor” begins (which is still one of the main arguments between pro-life and pro-choice advocates). Finally, Tolle argued that right of a child was more important than the muliebrity’s previously stated â€Å"right to privacy. However, the three judges found that the Texas abortion laws were un essential by depriving rights dictated by the ordinal Amendment. Since this alone declared the law unconstitutional and did not prevent the enforcing of the law, the plaintiffs because appealed to the despotic Court. In October 1972, the plaintiffs and the defendants make their cases as they had before. Several things played into the Court’s following decision: the ruling of Eisenstadt v Baird, which made it legal for unmarried souls to use birth control.This solidified Weddington’s argument for the right to privacy in the Ninth Amendment; that individuals postulate the right to be leave office from government intervention in fields such(prenominal) as whether or not to have a child. Second, Justice Harry Blackmun, subsequently reviewing the abortion statutes, recoverd that they were no daylong valid because they were put in straddle due to the dangers of abortion; this was no longstanding an issue, as abortion was just as safe as childbirth in the present time. Concerning the rights of the unborn as a child, Blackmun found that nowhere in theConstitution or Bill of Rights (specifically, the Fourteenth Amendment) a â€Å"person” includes the unborn. The final ruling: the abortion decision mustiness be left to the ideal of the cleaning lady’s doctor in the first trimester. In the endorsement trimester, the state may â€Å"regulate the abortion part in ways that are sanely valid to maternal health. ” After that, the state can regulate or immobilise the abortion. Summary Norma McCorvey wanted an abortion, further could not obtain would since it was illegal in her state, Texas.Most states at the time had abortion statutes in discover proscribing abortion. She, under the alias â€Å"Jane Roe,” and the two attorneys representing her, Sarah Weddington and Linda Coffee, filed a suit against the county of Dallas on the grounds that the abortion laws violated a muliebrity’s right to choose under the â€Å"right to privacy,” interpreted in the Ninth Amendment in the previous case Connecticut v Griswold. The district court ruled in favor of â€Å"Roe,” basing ideal upon the Ninth Amendment.This ruling did not prevent the enforcement of the abortion laws; rather, it solitary(prenominal) when stated that they were unconstitutional. McCorvey and her attorneys, now not only representing â€Å"Jane Roe” as a person, simply as all women, appealed directly to the controlling Court. On the opposing side, there was the position that the state believed they had the responsibility to protect the life of the unborn child. The argument against that was this: â€Å"when does life real start? ” It could be give tongue to that life doesn’t begin until later onwards the child is born; not when it is still a fetus.This really sparked this debate that still goes on today. Justice Harry Blackmun found that, after reviewing the Constitution and Bill of Rights, the Founding Fathers never explicitly put the unborn with the â€Å"persons” defend under our nation’s documents. However, he tell that this was not absolute. He said that, though he agreed that the Ninth Amendment encompassed a woman’s right to choose whether or not to terminate her pregnancy, the right to choose was also not absolute.So, they came to a compromise: during the first trimester of a pregnancy, abortion was legal, but at the judgment of the woman’s doctor (which has changed since then). During the second trimester, the state could regulate abortions in a way that is related to maternal health. During the thirdly trimester, the state could proscribe abortions. The general rule was that if the fetus is able to live orthogonal the womb (with artificial aid), which was typically at about 28 weeks, then the woman no longer has a right to an abortion. This entire case and the decisions that were made is a landmark in our history.It has sparked much debate and divided many people into â€Å"pro-life” and â€Å"pro-choice” groups. zip v Bolton A retainer case to Roe v Wade, Doe v Bolton was an abortion case that happened in tabun around the said(prenominal) time (decision on the same day) that its Texas transcript did. Much like other states with abortion laws, Georgia only allowed abortion if: the pregnancy was a danger to the woman’s life by judgment of a license physician, the fetus was in danger of existence born with a knockout defect, or if the abortion was a ware of rape (§ 26-1202(a)).The woman wanting an abortion also had to qualify for the following conditions, defined under § 26-1202(b) of Georgia Criminal law: â€Å"the abortion [is to] be performed in a hospital veritable by the critical point Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals, the procedure be approved by the hospital faculty abortion committee, and the performing physicians judgment be confirmed by independent examinations of the persevering by two other licensed physicians. ” Sandra Cano, a mother of three, did not foregather any of these conditions. Under the pseudonym â€Å"bloody shame Doe,” she and her attorney, Margie Pitts Hames, sued Arthur K.Bolton, the Attorney General for Georgia. Their claim was that the abortion statute of Georgia was unconstitutional. Like â€Å"Roe,” the three-judge panel of the district cour t found that Doe did, in fact, have standing in this issue. They ruled that the first three conditions (§ 26-1202(a)) listed above were unconstitutional, but they upheld the medical approval and conformation requirements. In addition, like Roe v Wade, they merely provided that the section of the law was unconstitutional; they did not give any cease and desist order against enforcing the law.This is called declaratory relief. The plaintiffs then appealed directly to the Supreme Court, like Roe and her attorneys. The arguments and counter-arguments were all the same as in Roe v Wade. The Court found that the three conditions in section 26-1202(b) were unconstitutional. They found that the JCAH accreditation requirement did not pertain to the woman’s right, and did not reasonably relate to the abortion statute. The two conditions requiring the abortion to be approved by a committee and by two other physicians were found to not answer the woman’s health in any way.Th e committee condition violated the woman’s â€Å"right to accept medical care” from her physician, and the two-doctor condition violated the physician’s â€Å"right to practice. ” These conditions were taken with(p) down. Justice Blackmun, mentioned in the previous case, said that Roe v Wade and Doe v Bolton must be sympathize together. The former allowed the states to proscribe abortion in the third trimester. However, Doe v Bolton added that the abortion could still be allowed if it was a matter of the woman’s health, in the imprint of the woman’s doctor.This is essentially a loophole around the â€Å"viability” requirement of the ruling of Roe v Wade. Doe v Bolton and Roe v Wade together smitten down state abortion laws and stricken up heated debates. These were the first real challenges regarding abortion in the United States. Both declared abortion a constitutional right. Summary Sandra Cano (â€Å"Mary Doe”) and atto rney Margie Pitts Hames sued the state of Georgia for its unconstitutional abortion statute. The district court found they had standing, but like Roe v Wade, they gave them only declaratory, not injunctive, relief.The plaintiffs appealed to the Supreme Court for broader relief. Georgia’s Criminal Code, section 26-1202(b), stated that in addition to the requirements to receive an abortion that a woman must be in danger from the pregnancy, the child must be in danger of skanky defect from birth, or the pregnancy being a result of rape, any woman wanting an abortion had to receive one in a hospital accredited by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals, she had to receive permission of two physicians other than her own, and the decision must also be approved by a hospital committee.The Court struck all of these requirements as unconstitutional. Additionally, the Court ruled that a woman may obtain an abortion after â€Å"viability” (as defined in Roe v Wade) if it was necessary to preserve her health. Along with its companion case, Roe v Wade, the decision was made on January 22, 1973, that abortion was a constitutional right.\r\n'

Monday, December 24, 2018

'The First Snowfall\r'

'The inaugural bumpfall incessantly seems so magical to me. My first glance of glittering, white snowflakes brings an external burst of joy. all(prenominal) tiny snowflake, from a distance, looks exactly the same. alone up close, I am able to see each unique design these small wonders possess. They shimmer and reflect exchangeable tiny little diamonds underneath the glisten of the street lamps. Floating ever so gently, down to the not-so-bare ground, a gentle atmosphere sends the snowflakes into a swirling dance before they total their journey to the earth.\r\nIn the distance, I target hear the shrieks and laughter of small children as they relish in pure and inculpable wonder, the joys of the first snowfall. I can and imagine them grabbing up handfuls of paper-light snow and throwing it into the air, adhesive their warm little tongues show up to go out the frostiness of the flakes. I glance to the unexpended of me and notice a cat clump in the corner of a palely l it doorway cove reddish in a thin blanket of crystal snow, shivering miserably and letting out pathetic meows as he waits to be let into the warmth of his home.\r\nThere is a cold kiss of wind against my flushed, red cheeks. And that chilly breeze sends a hastiness sound through my bare, cherry-coloured ears. Tiny droplets of water, unsloped moments ago were snowflakes, form on the hateful of my dark, auburn hair. I exhale crisply and watch as a abbreviated mist forms from my warm breath, mixing with the nippy air. I hear the unmistakable shrill crunch of snow, as my boot hits the blanketed pavement. It is just about impossible to walk silently in the snow.\r\nI thoroughly screw the first snowfall. I stand outside and question at its beauty, as the earth is secure in the brightest, white blanket my look have ever perceived. I enjoy kicking up the lightness of the snow before it becomes heavy and hard with the lading of perpetual snowfall. I stand at that place and let the tiny, diamond like flakes cover me for just a moment, because I spang that soon this mesmerizing snowfall depart soon transform into a bitter, long, bone-chilling winter.\r\n'